Monday, February 8, 2021

Music of The Spheres of Someone's Life

 There are a few music-makers whose music hovers close toward me and mine.  Usually, I have two immediate responses: two steps forward, "YES!" and a muted one step out of the queue, "But what about that?"   Haha, I was just looking at the lineup to the 2019 music fest at Nowhere Else, the ranch of Linford Detweiler and Karin Bergquist, collectively known as Over the Rhine.  

Here's that poster. * 

*not 2021, mind you.  


Yes indeed. These are all such good people, and they make such good music.  About that "other" reaction, well, sometimes I look in the mirror and ask, "Who are you and what did you do with the guy?"  Probably the more comfortable we all get with life, the easier it is to love people and ourselves with comfort and grace, letting us all be what we are and not what we wish.  

Over the Rhine, or Linford and Karin, have a festival coming up this year.  Three days of peace and understanding, I think that's what I heard.  Maybe that was some other festival, I don't know.  But knowing the good folk at Nowhere Else, we can trust that the three days are likely to be the odds-on favorite bet for a good time in 2021.


While I'm saying nice things about music and musicians, let me share with you my admiration for Susie Glaze, who, with her husband Steve Rankin and long-time musical friends Fred Sanders and Mark Indictor, play good music and aim for the high ground, shall we say. I just love these folks. This recent performance was brought to my attention, and I'd like to bring it to yours.

https://youtu.be/lLa9AYEGQTg


FYI, you can find both Over The Rhine's festival and Susie Glaze by following these links, and you'll also find a hearty helping of each over at YouTube.

http://www.nowhereelsefestival.com/#nowhere-else-festival  (This is for the 2021 festival.)

http://overtherhine.com

https://www.susieglaze.com

Wednesday, August 5, 2020

KEEP YOUR BALANCE


(In an earlier version, I had a picture of Antje Duvekot's album cover, "The Near Demise of the High Wire Dancer."  https://www.antjeduvekot.com/index.php?page=cds&display=1007  Please visit Antje at https://www.youtube.com/user/AntjeDuvekotChannel)

Keep your balance

It's all about making your way through ordinary life and the trials thereof.  And not getting too caught up in the winds that blow and the momentary light afflictions.  Stay the course.

These are a few helpful areas to emphasize, so we can keep together in troubled times.

Human touch.  Make peace with those in your house.  Family and loved ones.  

The music is good.  Music to listen to, and music as music practice and lessons and preparing for performing and then performing.  Even for people in your house and on the street where you live.  Some people make online concerts, which can be as low key as you like.

Exercise.  My grandkids are into weightlifting and the like, but when the gyms closed, they stopped.  But that's just a hindrance, not a closed door.  I'm as low-key a fellow as you're likely to find, but even I have a treadmill that will work when I turn it on.  

Is this all?  Nope, not by a long shot.  Is it complete advice? Nah.  Is it something?  Well, yeah.  And, gotta say, it's what I've been landing on, to emphasize, to keep my own balance.  I didn't even mention the regular strategies.

A problem with giving and taking advice about how to get through life is that people have their own issues, circumstances, and so forth.  For instance, someone has trouble seeing.  So you say, my glasses helped me, here try them on.  What? They didn't help? 

Thursday, July 16, 2020

THE USA is holding to a higher standard of social distancing than the world at large. Why? PART ONE.

The USA is holding to a higher standard of social distancing than the world at large.  
Reflected in markers such as that we want to keep schools closed, while the rest of the world is not.

Why is this?

Two heuristics or guides to thought are to use personality traits (OCEAN/the Big Five) to predict what ought to happen if such and such were the case, and to view things through what ought to happen if a group assumes Christian metaphysics as the reality on which we base the rightness or wrongness of our prudent actions.

A problem with trying to ask and answer this title's question is that an ad hoc explanation could go either way and have no compelling force.  So to make the analysis a little better, we would have to spell out what the conditions were, and predict what the assumptions would lead to, singularly and in interaction.


Monday, April 13, 2020

Loving the Truth, Receiving the Truth, Defending the Truth.




One of my children, when he went to college, thought that the philosophy class would be a lot like dinnertime with Dad, where we would socratically talk about ideas, to get to the truth.  But, alas, he was being asked to remember dates and pivotal figures and power struggles.  It would be fair to say that this child of mine did not enjoy the course, any more than I would have.
Over adult years, this child of mine, now fully grown with serious responsibilities, and whom I respect greatly, has stopped having discussions like these with me.  He thought that I was sparring, or playing, with no serious point to it.  As if our adult conversations were to the truth as high school wrestling is to hand to hand warfare with bayonets.  I was seeing our adult conversations as more analogous to Fort Benning or Parris Island, with the truth as being the next hill to take, at possible cost to our lives.
And as anyone who has trained and fought in the military or as a first responder, there is a joy to being part of a Band of Brothers (or the equivalent), and a joy in fighting a good fight, even where there is pain and suffering and the possible loss of all good things.  The stakes are high, in loving and receiving the truth, and in defending the weak and the oppressed and in defending freedom.
When Lewis uses the word 'art', we may fairly substitute 'philosophy' or 'ideas' or even the humble term, 'words'.
Lewis writes:
A work of (whatever) art can be either ‘received’ or ‘used.’  When we ‘receive’ it we exert our senses and imagination and various other powers according to a pattern invented by the artist. When we ‘use’ it we treat it as assistance for our own activities. The one, to use an old-fashioned example, is like being taken for a bicycle ride by a man who may know roads we have never yet explored. The other is like adding one of those little motor attachments to our own bicycle and then going for one of our familiar rides. These rides in themselves may be good, bad, or indifferent. The ‘uses’ which the many make of the arts may or may not be intrinsically vulgar, depraved, or morbid. That’s as may be. ‘Using’ is inferior to ‘reception’ because art, if used rather than received, merely facilitates, brightens, relieves or palliates our life, and does not add to it.
C.S. Lewis.  An Experiment in Criticism, p. 88.

Wednesday, February 13, 2019

Favorite Bible Chapters, Follow Up #1

Here's a whole book devoted to someone else's idea of (sq rt n) important chapters of the Bible.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01N0C5LD0/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&linkCode=sl1&tag=redletters-20&linkId=b37c6c9aead5794a66e84949beab615f&language=en_US


The Good Book: 40 Chapters That Reveal the Bible's Biggest Ideas


Again, a great selection.  Our author, Deron Spoo, explains why each chapter is important.

Here they are:
Genesis 1
             3
             6
             12
             22
Exodus 3
             14
            20
Judges 16
1 Samuel 17
Job 1
Psalm 23
           51
          139
Proverbs 1
Isaiah 53
Jeremiah 1
Daniel 3, 6
Jonah 1
-----
John 1
Luke 2
Matthew 5
              6
              7
Luke  8
John 3
Luke 15
Mark 15
Matthew 28
Acts 1
        2
        9
       10
Revelation 22
Romans 8
1 Corinthians 13
Galatians 5
James 1
1 John 3.


It's a great list, a great selection.
Someone could read these through every week, at 5 or 6 chapters a day.  Deron Spoo explains the importance of each chapter in his book's table of contents.

Likewise with my list, at 6 to 7 chapters a day.  Here's my list again. I explain the important of each chapter in the discussion, on the previous post.  Here's a link.

Matthew 5-7, 27-28 5
Luke 1 1
John 1, 10, 14-17 5
Romans 1-8 8
James 1-5 5
Genesis 1-8, 11-20 18
Exodus 20  1
Isaiah 53 1
Psalm 22, 23 2
Proverbs 31 1  
                                  TOTAL: 47

Sunday, February 10, 2019

Favorite Bible Chapters and the Inverse Square Law

Favorite Bible Chapters and the Inverse Square Law.

There are various derived laws from the algebraic inverse square law.  I'm thinking of Price's Square Root Law and the Pareto Principle.  They are EMPIRICAL principles--explaining, after the fact of watching closely, rather than PREDICTIVE laws--which would predict with precision the outcome of an experiment.  Which is close enough for an after the fact explanation or making a general plan and trying your best to do something.


A similar law is the Bell Curve.  Which says, in my folksy explanation, that most events or things we can measure will fall within a stone's throw from what almost everyone does.  Dilly Dilly, for most, not the few®.  (I do not drink, well, almost never--both to support my recovering friends and for my own good future. Yes, "Jesus drank wine, He and his disciples,"..."But he never hid the whiskey in the toilet!"--Cormac McCarthy, The Sunset Limited.)


They are universal--apply to everything.  I have 9 grandchildren, and 50% of the time I spend with my grandchildren are with three in particular. How interesting.


Your Bible.  If you are a regular but not systematic Bible reader, a few sections will be read much more than the rest.  And that's ok.

We also have the example of lectionaries picking the favorites, and catechisms which select some themes as most important.  So what to think?  Here's my thought experiment.



The Bible has 1189 chapters.
20% (1189), about  238 The Pareto idea is that 238 chapters do 80% of the work.
Sq rt (1189), about 34 The Price Law idea is 34 chapters do 50% of the work.

A.  The first draft, toward narrowing down the scriptures to that Sweet Spot selection.

MATTHEW  5, 6, 7, 27, 28 5
LUKE  1, 2, 24 3
JOHN  1, 3, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17           7
ACTS  1, 2, 9 3
ROMANS  1 - 12. 12
1 CORINTHIANS  3, 7, 11-15            7
PHILIPPIANS 2 1
1 THESSALONIANS 4 1
1 TIM, 2 TIM, TITUS 3
HEBREWS 1-13 13
JAMES 1-5 5
REV 1-3, 19-22 6
subtot:   66 chapters
GENESIS 1-15 15
EXODUS 3 -20 17
JOB 1-42 42
PSALMS 1-150 150
PROVERBS 1-31 31
ISAIAH 6, 14, 35, 53 4
JEREMIAH 31 1
LAMENTATIONS 1-5 5
ZECHARIAH 14 1
MALACHI 3, 4 2
TOTAL: 334  too many (28%)

B.  Next draft: Matt 5-7, John 1, 10, 14-17; Romans 1-12, Hebrews 1-13,  [34 so far], James 1-5 Rev 1-3, 19-22; Genesis 1-8, Exodus 20, Isaiah 53, Zechariah 14, Malachi 3,4  which is 58 chapters, which is about [3* (sq rt 1189)]  Plus all the Psalms and Proverbs 181 chapters added.  Three times too large for the Price Square Root Law and it leaves out Ps and Pr.

C.  Third draft:  Added back Ps 22 (Suffering Servant), Ps 23 (heard in every Christian funeral I’ve ever attended), and Proverbs 31 (a devotional favorite, spoken to women but the mirror image of the rest of Proverbs directed to men).

Matt 5-7 3
John 1, 10, 14-17 5
Romans 1-8 8
James 1-5 5
Genesis 1-8 8
Exodus 20,           1
Isaiah 53 1
Psalm 22, 23 2
Proverbs 31 1 TOTAL: 34

The number works, but the selection doesn’t.  Go to Fourth Draft.

D.  Fourth draft: One friend mentioned that the three greatest events in history are not here: the Incarnation, the Crucifixion, and the Resurrection.  Also the revelation of God to Abraham.  So I added back Luke 1 (Incarnation), Matthew 27 and 28 (the Crucifixion and Resurrection) and Genesis 11-20 (the story of Abraham).


Matthew 5-7, 27-28 5
Luke 1 1
John 1, 10, 14-17 5
Romans 1-8 8
James 1-5 5
Genesis 1-8, 11-20 18
Exodus 20  1
Isaiah 53 1
Psalm 22, 23 2
Proverbs 31 1  
                                  TOTAL: 47

The square of 47 is about twice the square of 34.  But only 12 more chapters.  I call it as a win.  

But see below, "Why the short list is not enough."




A CONTRAST TO THE SELECT FEW CHAPTERS APPROACH.  
It's all inspired, even the genealogies and strange visions.  I'm not going to dispute with God about this. 

For my personal Bible reading plan:  
One chapter each day:
Genesis - Deuteronomy 27 weeks cycle
Joshua - Job 42 weeks cycle
Old Testament after Proverbs 33 weeks cycle
Gospels 13 weeks cycle
New Testament after Gospels 25 weeks cycle
And...                                                                     Thanks Billy Graham for the tip--
Psalms 5 per day except 
Ps 119 alone (on 25th of month)            1 month cycle (4 1/3 weeks)
Proverbs 1 per day                                              1 month cycle (4 1/3 weeks)

In practice, this works out to once or twice a year through the whole scriptures plus monthly through Psalms and Proverb.  Also, in practice, this means that when I skip a day or a week, but come back to regular reading soon, that I'll still keep fresh with the whole Book.  The system is forgiving toward not being able to always work the system. The truly biggest problem with this approach is that it takes about a half hour for everything except Psalms and Proverbs, another 15-20 minutes. It's justified because I feel a need to see things from God's point of view instead of any other point of view from culture, friends, or profession. It competes with daily responsibilities; which means that there is a real cost, and not a casual habit. It is feasible, able to be done; it's just not an automatic thing.

Also, this is broad and shallow reading.  There is some advantage to broad and shallow, such as being reminded of the parts that you don't want to hear, and to be shaken out of a too narrow faith.


There is a time and place for deep, prolonged, concentrated reading on one verse at a time, or one word at a time, or one book at a time.  


In the college Christian group to which I belonged, Inter-Varsity Christian Fellowship, we learned inductive Bible study and Bible memorization.  I also learned them from Cru (Campus Crusade for Christ, then) and The Navigators.  From all three, I learned the value of "front lines." 


For a while during the 1980s, I read the book of Job one chapter a day, in addition to anything else, so that I might somehow understand the book. All Job's friends seemed to be right, so why did God say they were wrong? It took some time to understand (better) the difference between being having the right answers and being right before God.  

Another time honored way of close reading is Lectio Divina, which too has great benefits.  

One downside of all three methods is that we may easily hear what we want to hear without confronting God's word "against us." 


Another downside to all methods of Bible reading-is that we might come to believe that the scriptures just dropped down from heaven, which they didn't.  They emerged from the life of the people of God, and yes, are God-breathed. There's room for having a historical awareness and awareness of good ways of interpreting versus poor ways of interpreting scripture.


The upside to all methods of Bible reading is that if we see past the practice to see Jesus Christ, then frequent reading of scripture can be part of a complete life lived before God, across a complete lifetime, under the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.

II.              Some technical notes.

A.  Applications of the Inverse Square Law

Price's square root law states that half of the literature on a subject will be contributed by the square root of the total number of authors publishing in that area.

The Pareto distribution, named after the Italian civil engineer, economist, and sociologist Vilfredo Pareto, is a power-law probability distribution that is used in description of social, scientific, geophysical, actuarial, and many other types of observable phenomena. Originally applied to describing the distribution of wealth in a society, fitting the trend that a large portion of wealth is held by a small fraction of the population, the Pareto distribution has colloquially become known and referred to as the Pareto principle, or "80-20 rule", and is sometimes called the "Matthew principle". This rule states that, for example, 80% of the wealth of a society is held by 20% of its population. However, the Pareto distribution only produces this result for a particular power value, (α = log45 ≈ 1.16). While α is variable, empirical observation has found the 80-20 distribution to fit a wide range of cases, including natural phenomena and human activities. 

The Matthew effect, Matthew principle, or Matthew effect of accumulated advantage can be observed in many aspects of life and fields of activity. It is sometimes summarized by the adage "the rich get richer and the poor get poorer."[1][2] The concept is applicable to matters of fame or status, but may also be applied literally to cumulative advantage of economic capital.The term was coined by sociologist Robert K. Merton in 1968[3] and takes its name from the Parable of the talents or minas in the biblical Gospel of Matthew. Merton credited his collaborator and wife, sociologist Harriet Zuckerman, as co-author of the concept of the Matthew effect.[4]  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthew_effect

My principles of selection.  

In the first draft, I just called to mind parts of the Bible that seemed important somehow.  

For later drafts, the principles were "what to believe" (orthodoxy); "what to do" (orthopraxy); who Jesus is and what he did taught; and scriptures that have been especially treasured in the larger body of Christ over centuries, inspiring piety, devotion, comfort and commitment to God.


B.        What is not included, and why the short list is not enough.


The rest of Psalms is not (but should be) included because of proven help to prayer.

The rest of Proverbs should be included as the most basic instruction in how to live.


Hebrews should be included to explain who Jesus is and what he did.


Hebrews should also be included because of Heb 6:1,2 a list of the most basic topics of doctrine.  


2 Peter 1 should be included because of the list of the most basic virtues of Christian life.


Almost all narratives are left out in deference to the interpretive passages that guide our understanding of the narratives (stories).  Narratives inspire our faith, but doctrine guides our faith.  This lack of narrative takes away many of the great children's stories and sources of inspiration, and cautionary tales.


Almost all the prophetic scriptures are left out, because prophecy is all about measuring the way we live against the way God wants us to live, and reprove us for not holding on to the very point of the standards during our lives.  Both prophecy in this approach, and grace as an experience of life in the Holy Spirit, address this concern. 


The prophetic scriptures should be included to focus our minds on final things on which we place our hope, Christ's return, our Blessed Hope; as well as the chastising that God brings to His children who nevertheless wander; and disasters that God ultimately brings on nations that harden their hearts against Him.  


C.  Please consider these three further readings.

Walter Bruggemann's The Creative Word: Canon As a Model for Biblical Education.
Tom Green's Voices: The Educational Formation of Conscience.  
My own book, in a free download on Academia.edu, Practice Makes Perfect: Christian Education Viewed as Initiation Into a Practice.  The idea is that Christianity is part of a complete way of life, and what that would mean.

Friday, December 14, 2018

On Teaching Philosophy to Undergraduates: BEST PRACTICE?

ON TEACHING PHILOSOPHY TO UNDERGRADUATES: BEST PRACTICE?

We can use this page to leave comments and banter our ideas.
Here are my original comments from a Facebook exchange hosted by Jeremy Pierce.


Jeremy Pierce with Sophia Pierce: 
"Why do my English teachers tell us that you can't write an essay overnight while then expecting us to write essays in a half hour on our exams?"

Steve Hays Yes, in-class essay tests subvert the point of an essay test. It shouldn't be a test of how fast you can think and write and try to organize your thoughts under pressure, but how well you understand a topic. Your ability to analyze it. A take-home essay test is the way to go.

Jeremy Pierce Or do it in class but give them time to do it properly.

Bruce Meyer:  
Or make the topic small enough to do a decent first draft in fifteen minutes. This question raises a good objection to in class essay exams, and I for my part don't test with them. But I do lean heavily on outside of class essays submitted electronically (to be checked by SafeAssign), for the sole purpose of having students HAVE an opinion and then to ARTICULATE A CONTRARY opinion; and then I encourage them to rewrite their essay if the contrary position they came up with persuades them, in which case they make the old contrary position their new "I say that" position.

Bruce Meyer:
Continuing: I read that a study somewhere (on the internet so it must be true!!) said that good multiple choice tests do a snapshot assessment of the student as do essays, to 95% accuracy. The source of my opinion here (the study I browsed) seemed credible at the time, and if anyone challenged me (enough for me to care) then that study could be found. But the claim has intuitive sense to me, so I felt ok to go with it. // If there's an off-FB discussion that you other persons (Jeremy Pierce and his readers on educational strategies) could continue this discussion on--optimal ways of teaching philosophy to undergraduate non-academic-professional philosophers--I would be much interested. I could even host it on my blog, beinghumaninfaithartscience.blogspot.com. I'll go set up a page to receive comments that we can expand on--just in case anyone is interested.